No. 22-5665

Geoffrie Dill v. United States

Lower Court: Seventh Circuit
Docketed: 2022-09-22
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appeals controlled-substance controlled-substances criminal-law drug-offense federal-jurisdiction federal-sentencing sentencing-guidelines statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2022-10-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does 'controlled substance offense' refer only to substances prohibited by the Controlled Substance Act?

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTION PRESENTED Does “controlled substance offense”, as that term is used in U.S.S.G. §4B1.1 and defined by U.S.S.G. §4B1.2(b), refer only to those controlled substances that are prohibited by the Controlled Substance Act, 21 U.S.C. 801, et seq.? ii PARTIES The caption of the case contains the name of all the parties. The Petitioner is Geoffrie Dill and the Respondent is the United States of America. No party is a corporation. ili RULE 14(b)(iii) STATEMENT This case arises from the following proceedings in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, and the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit: United States v. Dill, No. 21-2672 (7th Cir. 2022) United States v. Dill, No. (S.D. Ind. Sept. 13, 2021) Dill v. United States, No. (S.D. Ind. May 24, 2021) There are no other directly

Docket Entries

2022-10-31
Petition DENIED.
2022-10-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/28/2022.
2022-09-28
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-09-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 24, 2022)

Attorneys

Geoffrie Dill
Terry TolliverBrattain Minnix Tolliver, Petitioner
Terry TolliverBrattain Minnix Tolliver, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent