No. 22-5671
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: batson-framework batson-v-kentucky due-process equal-protection intentional-discrimination jury-selection mccollum-v-georgia peremptory-challenges racial-discrimination
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2022-11-10
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Supreme Court of Georgia violate the Equal Protection of the Laws
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Did the Supreme Court of Georgia violate the Equal Protection of the Laws by disallowing three of Petitioner’s peremptory challenges to white jurors after a colloquy that failed either to apply the Batson / McCollum framework properly or to produce reliable findings of intentional discrimination? 1
Docket Entries
2022-11-14
Petition DENIED
2022-11-14
Petition DENIED.
2022-10-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/10/2022.
2022-10-21
Waiver of right of respondent Georgia to respond filed.
2022-09-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 24, 2022)
Attorneys
Andre Byrd
Stephen Randall Scarborough — Stephen R. Scarborough, Petitioner
Stephen Randall Scarborough — Stephen R. Scarborough, Petitioner
Georgia
Stephen John Petrany — Georgia Department of Law, Respondent
Stephen John Petrany — Georgia Department of Law, Respondent