Was it cruel and unusual punishment to change Henderson's sentence from 45-to-life plus years to life, without parole, without a court hearing after serving 30 years and denying Henderson youth offender parole under § 2051?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED : 1) WAS IT CRDEL AND UNUSUAL Pun ESHMENT To CHANG HENDERSON'S SENTENCE. FROM @5-To-LiFE PLoS YEARS. To LIFE, WITHOUT PAROJ.E witNout A COUR] KEAN Ns AFTER SERVING 30 YEARS ANA DENYING HENDERSON YouTH MFFENQER PARALE UNDER & 2051? AWD ELDERLY PAROLES ID) 36 CRDEL AND ONUSDAL PUNISHMENT BEING INFLICTED IN TRE Farm oF PSYCOLOGICA i TOURTURE DFON MR HENOQERSON ? TIT) Does HENDERSON HAVE A FOURTEEN AMENDMENT RIGHT LIBERTY IWTIEREST | , TO ng TE) Ma HendERS0 N WAS SCHADGLED FoR : PAROLE HEARINGS MORE THAN FIVE.(5) , TES AND GiveN A A-YEAR DENIAL an) | APRIL 17, 2020. Qo£S HE Not HAVE LIBERT? INTEREST In PARDLE VESTED IN THE QUE PROCESS OF THE BTH ANN LTH AMENDMENTS oF THE U.S, Const? , | . i\ 1 QUESTIONS Continued 3 V) WAS, MR MENDERSON, STATE COURT : , QENIAL THE RESULT oF PRETIDICE 5 BY THE PROSECUTION, JENNIFER RS. sll MEITEN, AND SUPERIOR CouRT TINGE QOonNALA FRANSON, WHOM Rom HAVE. QEEN APPOINTELY TO THE 5 — COURT OF APPEALS FTA APPEALLATE. 10 AistRiCT wHo DENIED THE PETITION — 1 WitHOST REASON £ . ail