No. 22-5687
Michael G. Peters v. Mital K. Brammbatt
Tags: anti-slapp civil-rights cruel-unusual-punishment due-process judicial-conspiracy prison-mail-misappropriations racketeering rico rico-anti-slapp selective-prosecution standing
Key Terms:
FirstAmendment
FirstAmendment
Latest Conference:
2022-12-02
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the lower courts erred in dismissing petitioner's claims alleging a decade-long cover-up of political, judicial, and corporate racketeering crimes
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. : &y. WIA Af NOF SUSAS Be MOIWN£0 FO LSE Fa CeuUlZS BS #A PLLA FULD Fo 1ebKE SEH S VE VIET M CMPYGEABLSS Fife fl? SS. KVGEOHHO Of NO SUN/4A0 Cito rry IS” Flite AVSSPKMALYY Lh LK) kaa Lb, eh Wtbl O00 NOF YAS LACH FO? SUWN64AS. JO CNAME ZOaMVSF LINNAANG Klrtttl (AN GSA ZEN | Fo LOUHSVNY FLBESD (Kl AR-ACLAS CULM LW6 CYNE [Ko ZL0tlt aA) LLYIV SN Lf $F lOlUKRCE Fes — MBOUP LYE SH) Ket GLUES ct CONMCASSLLS!
Docket Entries
2022-12-05
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
2022-11-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/2/2022.
2022-08-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 28, 2022)