No. 22-570

Richard Y. Kim v. Hawaii Office of Elections, et al.

Lower Court: Hawaii
Docketed: 2022-12-20
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: administrative-procedure civil-rights due-process election-certification election-regulations elections federal-rules judicial-discretion state-rules state-sovereignty voting-machines
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2023-02-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)

If this honorable US Supreme Court determines that the Elections Office of Hawaii (EOH) failed to follow State Rules and Regulations and due process, e.g. failure of or no certification on voting machine test, and Supreme Court of Hawaii (SCH) abused its discretion in this case, should States like Hawaii, who has own rules and regulations in such election process, now adopt or be required to have Federal Rules and Regulations, instead?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

No question identified. : | i od QUESTION If this honorable US Supreme Court determines | Elections Office of Hawaii (EOH) failed to follow State Rules and Regulations and due process, e.g. ‘ failure of or no certification on voting machine test, : and Supreme Court of Hawaii (SCH) abused its . discretion in this case, should States like Hawaii, ; who has own rules and regulations in such election process, now adopt or be required to have Federal Rules and Regulations, instead?

Docket Entries

2023-02-21
Petition DENIED.
2023-01-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/17/2023.
2023-01-12
Waiver of right of respondent Hawaii Office of Elections, et al. to respond filed.
2022-10-17

Attorneys

Hawaii Office of Elections, et al.
Kimberly Tsumoto GuidryDepartment of the Attorney General, State of HI, Respondent
Kimberly Tsumoto GuidryDepartment of the Attorney General, State of HI, Respondent
Richard Kim
Richard Y. Kim — Petitioner
Richard Y. Kim — Petitioner