Does the precedent that a defendant's incarceration during the COVID-19 Pandemic, when the defendant has access to the COVID-19 vaccine, does not present an 'extraordinary and compelling reason' warrant a compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A), contravene the will of Congress by impermissibly restraining the district courts and also contravene the traditional deference to public health emergencies

No question identified. : Questions Mesented A. Does -the precedent thet “Gi cdefindant!'s lacarcera Hon ducing the CoVvin=l& Pandemic~ when the defendant has acess-to the Conid-ig vaccine dees not Preseyt @9 ‘ ectreecding Gnd compelling reason* WALK ati A Co SE CvICe a cre fon ~ S(A'p eet the will ef Conarcess by Im permiss \ bly netraining the? distict courts and diso ContraveneHthre -traditidnal deference of ty pualic health oe kee rency : LS. y Lemens IS FE bh FAX, A im Zozl): ) Board of Nassau euakg v Aclipé 480 (LS, 273 23F AG. Zoe Must +e district Co uct address wl gourds LISP BO motion te i _teCductton Th | antevice. MUS et Socth speci i | GAAinas UDRP acte i> Len Ce * eOHener “TNAGN , Fr 19 enime _«f'!con cttén when ciccumsetang , | “Reference. Fepperv US, 562 US. 476,44 (Zoi SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI | Petitioner respectfully prays that a writ of certiorari issue to review the judgment below. OPINIONS BELOW _bs[ For cases from federal courts: The opinion of the United States Court of Appeals appears at