Should SCOTUS handle corruption-in-circuits cases separately?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED The Questions Presented that follow provide this Court with an opportunity to address vital questions about its ability to deal with questions of law, corruption, and injury caused by a Circuit that is corrupt from the Bankruptcy Court, through District Court, all the way to its Court of Appeals. In this case, we are talking about the Third Circuit with a particular emphasis on District Court Judge Esther Salas, who was aided and abetted in Judicial Misconduct, Docket Fraud, and Mail Fraud by then Chief Judge D. Brooks Smith. When Petitioners proved beyond any doubt that District Court Judge Esther Salas committed Judicial Misconduct, Docket Fraud, and Mail Fraud and asked Chief Judge D. Brooks Smith to rebuke her and reverse her corrupt decisions, he admitted that the violations occurred. Still, he took no action, claiming that the Clerk of the Court was responsible, not Salas. The people of the’ United States are interested in the large issues in our county, such as the relative control over decision-making exercised by individual states versus the federal government. They are interested in whether states control abortion matters or the federal government. However, they are most interested in receiving protection from corrupt state and federal judges who ignore facts, refuse to conduct investigations required by Congress, misconduct themselves, and commit civil and criminal fraud, i.e., Esther Salas. Therefore, I have the following questions to ask. They, in part, deal less directly with the particular crimes of Judges Salas and Smith, which are beyond doubt, and more with the role of the United States Supreme Court over the next several decades. In one sense, they address the relevance of the United States Supreme Court when what most affects their daily lives, unchecked official corruption of judges, clerks, and courts, appears not to be of concern to the : members of SCOTUS. They DO NOT want to hear that their most sacred concerns in life, adversely affected by judicial corruption, are not sufficiently precedential for the nine members of this Court. ii State and federal courts in New Jersey have violated, in lockstep, our 4th, Sth, 8th, and 14th Amendment Rights since October 2006. Question 1: Should SCOTUS, in its present form, be managing Writs of Certiorari or Mandamus, which specifically involve corruption in the Circuits, or should the Supreme Court be split into two or more separate courts: one handling precedential petitions, one handling standard mandamus petitions, and one other handling cases that specifically address corruption, misconduct, and criminality in state courts and, as in New Jersey, an entire Circuit? Question 2: After reading App. 2-4 in this Petition: What is SCOTUS prepared to do with District Court Judge Esther Salas and former Chief Judge D. Brooks Smith? Question 3: It is evident -that District Court Judge Esther Salas felt an extraordinary degree of empathy for the Judge Defendants, the Panel Trustee, and the individual defendant who defrauded the Federal Court System by participating in a , shill bidder auction in Trenton, New Jersey in July 2017: Should Lynn Z. Smith v. Dobin, et al. be remanded to discovery, depositions, and trial in another state within the Third Circuit, such as Pennsylvania? Or can a substantial Opinion clean up the Third Circuit? . Question 4. After realizing the Petitioner has suffered from Constitutional Rights and other violations by Judge Salas and the defendants, . will the members of this Court respond to 16 years of state and federal official abuse (including the Office of the United States ‘ ; Attorney who possesses records that prove the reasons for this serial corruption and fraudulent concealment) and act on this Petition or convert it to a Mandamus Petition, remanding this matter to trial with the Right to include Esther Salas, the U.S. Attorney General, and New Jersey Attorney General as defendants? lii 0