No. 22-5730

Quincy Campbell v. United States

Lower Court: Seventh Circuit
Docketed: 2022-10-03
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review burden-of-proof coconspirator-testimony criminal-procedure due-process judicial-error relevant-conduct sentencing sentencing-guidelines
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw
Latest Conference: 2022-10-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the district court erred in sentencing the defendant

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW I. Whether the district court erred by sentencing the Defendant to one twenty (120) months in light of the circumstances of the case? IL. Whether the government met its burden to prove relevant conduct by only proving the testimony of an uncharged coconspirator that gave conflicting testimony? ii

Docket Entries

2022-10-31
Petition DENIED.
2022-10-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/28/2022.
2022-10-06
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
Main DocumentMain Document
2022-09-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 2, 2022)
PetitionPetition

Attorneys

Quincy Campbell
Bart Edward Beals — Beals Law Firm, LLC, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent