No. 22-5731
IFP
Tags: capital-trial confrontation-clause criminal-procedure eligibility-phase selection-phase sentencing-phase sixth-amendment witness-confrontation
Key Terms:
DueProcess Punishment
DueProcess Punishment
Latest Conference:
2023-01-06
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Sixth Amendment's Confrontation Clause secures an accused's right to confront witnesses against him throughout the sentencing phase of a capital trial
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the Sixth Amendment’s Confrontation Clause secures an accused’s right to confront witnesses against him throughout the sentencing phase of a capital trial.
Docket Entries
2023-01-09
Petition DENIED.
2022-12-23
Reply of petitioner Jonathan D. Carr filed. (Distributed)
2022-12-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/6/2023.
2022-12-02
Brief of respondent Kansas in opposition filed.
2022-10-20
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 2, 2022.
2022-10-19
Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 2, 2022 to December 2, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2022-09-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 2, 2022)
2022-07-15
Application (22A35) granted by Justice Gorsuch extending the time to file until October 1, 2022.
2022-07-11
Application (22A35) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from August 2, 2022 to October 1, 2022, submitted to Justice Gorsuch.
Attorneys
Jonathan D. Carr
Clayton James Perkins — Capital Appellate Defender Office, Petitioner
Kansas
Brant M. Laue — Solicitor General of Kansas, Respondent