Thomas A. Scott v. Lonnie Oliver, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Albion, et al.
DueProcess HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
Does the judgement of sentence represent a manifest injustice warranting the supervisory powers of this honorable court as it shakes societys confidence in the integrity of the courts and judicial process?
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 4. DOES THE JUDGEMENT OF SENTENCE REPRESENT A MAINIFEST INJUSTICE | WARRANTING THE SUPERVISORY POWERS OF THIS HONORABLE COURT AS IT SHAKES SOCIETYIES CONFIDENCE IN THE INTERGRITY OF THE COURTS AND JUDICAL PROCESS? SUGGESTED ANSWER: YES 2, DID THE REVIEWING COURTS IN THIS MATTER ENTER DECISIONS THAT ARE | CONTRARY TO OR INVOLVE UNREASONABLE APPLICATION OF CLEARLY | ESTABLISHED FEDERAL LAW AS DETERMINED BY THIS HONORABLE COURT, | RESULTING IN A MAINIFEST INJUSTICE ? | SUGGESTED ANSWER: YES | | 3. THE JUDGEMENT OF SENTENCE REPRESENT A MAINIFEST INJUSTICE AND THE WRONGFUL CONVICTION OF ONE WHO IS ACTUALLY INNOCENT OF THE CRIMES CONVICTED OFWARRANTING REVIEW BY THIS COURT? SUGGESTED ANSWER: YES . 4. WAS PETITIONER DENIED DUE PROCESS OF THE LAW AND FAIR TRIAL IN VIOLATION OF HIS GUARANTEED RIGHTS UNDER FOURTH, FIFTH, SIXTH AND, FOURTEENTH AMENDMENTS OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION SUGGESTED ANSWER: YES “ iv f , .