Whether a reasonable officer would have known that Officer Stewart's warrant affidavit failed to establish probable cause and that he should not have applied for the warrant?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED \ typuld a veasonable dNicer haw known +nat+ OPRcer slewarts warrant afFdavit Fasled do establish probable. cause and that he should not have. app bed for the worrouk? 2. OR eer Stewart's affidaytk daserihad eonbech that dod not comsttute home invasion On he. only reasonable vead? ne of the Georgy ae 05 i+ had two missing e-ssoxtia| " . Dhould this eyuct Condone. the Seeks “4 of an Orrest warvaut arrest try Ana) | Cried a defend ant wh in \ ‘ Shab 2ssourlia\ elemants the offacer new dra not zxrst at theme the warrawh was SB taht eo 3. Does the Ovgual le ovebakle CAnka_ standard | Appry to M.Mahone's walicrous Praseution cladny where YO essenleal Clements of the anme at isswe Were Known Dy the arresting Rewer + be Miss) ng ~ dvd not eydst | Rae (at QuesTion(s) preserten 4 Would a veasen ably well trained ofFreer hove Known that his aPFidavrt fied + esteablrch Pwhable CaKse because t+we essentiq) lements dd not exrst thereby not affording | the offror Qual Red Jwnvn.ten ty 2 % Con a mistake oF law no mater hon Yeasonable, Support proba le pause “F@ Key element of The erime ts sHll misssy under th ns J @ mMistakey Mterpvetmly ° . eg @