No. 22-5746
Chrystal Clues-Alexander v. Louisiana
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-waiver criminal-procedure due-process guilty-plea jury-unanimity plea-bargaining plea-withdrawal ramos-retroactivity retroactivity right-to-jury-trial unanimous-jury
Key Terms:
JusticiabilityDoctri
JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2022-11-18
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether this Court's decision in Ramos v. Louisiana, 590 U.S. __ (2020), provides grounds for a defendant to withdraw her pre-Ramos plea of guilty before sentencing because the plea was entered without a knowing, intelligent, and voluntary waiver of the right to trial by a unanimous jury?
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether this Court’s decision in Ramos v. Louisiana, 590 U.S. __ (2020), provides grounds for a defendant to withdraw her pre-Ramos plea of guilty before sentencing because the plea was entered without a knowing, intelligent, and voluntary waiver of the right to trial by a unanimous jury?
Docket Entries
2022-11-21
Petition DENIED.
2022-11-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/18/2022.
2022-10-18
Waiver of right of respondent Louisiana to respond filed.
2022-09-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 3, 2022)
2022-09-21
Application (22A245) denied by Justice Alito.
2022-09-16
Application (22A245) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from September 26, 2022 to November 25, 2022, submitted to Justice Alito.
Attorneys
Chrystal Clues-Alexander
Jane Catherine Hogan — Hogan Attorneys, Petitioner
Jane Catherine Hogan — Hogan Attorneys, Petitioner
Louisiana