No. 22-5751
Mark Ryan Shipley, aka Marc R. Shipley, aka Marc Ryan Shipley v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-rights criminal-law criminal-procedure due-process federal-firearms-law felon-in-possession mens-rea rehaif statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2022-10-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the knowingly element apply to U.S.C. §921(a)(20)?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED DOES THE KNOWINGLY ELEMENT APPLY TO U.S.C. §921(a) (20)? DOES A STIPULATION AT THE TIME OF TRIAL THAT A DEFENDANT HAD AT SOME POINT IN THE PAST COMITTED A FELONY, PREVENT THAT DEFENDANT FROM PRESENTING A DEFENSE TO A JURY "THAT HE DID NOT KNOW THAT HE WAS A FELON," ACCORDING TO §921(a)(20), DO TO. HIS RIGHTS BEING RESTORED BY THE STAT OF ARIZONA? . [BOTH QUESTIONS ARE BASED ON REHAIF] ¥ | . a re
Docket Entries
2022-10-31
Petition DENIED.
2022-10-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/28/2022.
2022-10-11
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-08-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 3, 2022)
2022-07-22
Application (22A66) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until September 25, 2022.
2022-05-01
Application (22A66) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from July 27, 2022 to September 25, 2022, submitted to Justice Kagan.
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent