Ervin Carter v. Tim Hooper, Warden
DueProcess HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
Whether this Honorable United States Supreme Court 'must' investigate and resolve jurisdiction if raised by one of the petitioning party(ies) to the litigation?
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1.) Whether this Honorable United States Supreme Court ‘must’ investigate and resolve jurisdiction if raised by one of the petitioning party(ies) to the litigation? 2) Whether when jurisdiction to adjudicate is wanting in the lower federal court due to federal-preemption of state law (whereas the federally-preempted state law is the basis of the lower court judgment is), can the lower Federal Court legally transfer jurisdiction to this Honorable United States Supreme Court? 3.) Whether the lower transferring Federal Court lacking jurisdiction to adjudicate due to the challenged judgment being the by-product of federally preempted state law, can the lower court constitutionally evade satisfying itself on the issue of Federal-Preemption of State law before attempted to reach any other judgment? 4.) Whether this Honorable Court can by-pass the questions of jurisdiction being tainted by the existence and operation of State laws which suffered federal-preemption from their inception? §,.) Whether an enforceable judgment can constitutionally arise out of application of Federally-Preempted State Laws, being used to deprive a person, recognized as enjoying substantive constitutional protections from the existence and operation of federally-preempted state laws? iti | | | V.