No. 22-5756
Adelbert H. Warner, II v. K. Zook, Warden
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: 28-usc-2255 actual-innocence antiterrorism-act antiterrorism-and-effective-death-penalty-act constitutional-exception equal-protection habeas-corpus procedural-bars schlup-v-delo successive-application
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2023-01-06
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the Schlup v Delo, 513 US 298 (1995), actual innocence exception to procedural bars to habeas corpus relief serve as a gateway through the procedural bars created by the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act's limiting successive applications for habeas relief under 28 USC §2255?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Does the Schlup v Delo, 513 US 298 (1995), actual innocence exception to procedural bars to habeas corpus relief serve as a gateway through the procedural bars created by the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act's limiting successive applications for habeas relief under 28 USC §2255?
Docket Entries
2023-01-09
Rehearing DENIED.
2022-12-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/6/2023.
2022-11-20
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2022-10-31
Petition DENIED.
2022-10-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/28/2022.
2022-10-06
Waiver of right of respondent Zook, Warden to respond filed.
2022-09-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 3, 2022)
Attorneys
Adelbert H. Warner
Adelbert H. Warner III — Petitioner
Zook, Warden
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent