No. 22-5758

Augustus H. Evans, Jr. v. Delaware

Lower Court: Delaware
Docketed: 2022-10-04
Status: Dismissed
Type: IFP
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: appellate-procedure civil-rights commerce-clause constitutional-provisions due-process energy-policy environmental-regulation judicial-review legal-jurisdiction procedural-rules statutory-interpretation takings
Key Terms:
Arbitration SocialSecurity
Latest Conference: 2023-01-06 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does the Louisiana statute banning the sale of petrol-based motor vehicles violate the dormant Commerce Clause?

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED onl! uMbbe Mabenle dh Pliul 132 ex Gorter): noes do Loutatiél Guba auanl Melle oF Peoetedrlb, OLA KS Cause am wen wune Peottddlal Debut? MMah sehr ? two! Does buluke To be poured Jessile al eltde salted reel Bula AS Su Bi Chal THAT Mi hoes rolituoal ak hub 10 Pub Thal ? leur bh Fonte 605 A: 2d 860(Zo0r): Cras, bel § toe) Auld ws het Ve AABAMA LY Ud, 62S, 330/900) .. tlre : wniferilee Ini. Proves Chaué a Feaeteal Aura rivl Phoreees ateétese vil | Faure ouce tal) Ribose, LomPeotirséa BY LéThonr rit VL weil uj Bldltin 150 uel 2408 4461)! fue} wileatée ter bakes APicerioal ab Auealbed Loynsaldl fall (WUiTes EX Dosa lero Itws af ABIL $10 ab Ms Loui gl? Poltials i, Valeo 107 ls, 82 CM): kul 175 Heabialt | Gove; walezdete Dscodetoub Woke za! write cktllytoky Chante Sil WITS cabtemenlts 13 tenes After TRA ( cszabbsles 4 Beals violin 1F 30 Bowen? Been ih nelita 393. ed, 83 1963)! sik. wileaé THe Ferres Uibdes Cate Has soertblcn Tete burial Bevoles Haut) Lintzeoltist Peetébe7 al Lasd tf? onlé wilent £5 At ut MOOLE will THe uh SaPewwe Coder c¥Mtté DME Gul 7 sever) lite Panascll, nips Pé-zrartnleRs" Cali ualde-ze ohh dilesioad WE balé bf U9 05 Petrwalehe exteith to Feet batted t Fetzé rout Bel dens | 43 (bel, duke 12, to7)s

Docket Entries

2023-01-09
Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner DENIED.
2022-12-14
Motion DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/6/2023.
2022-11-28
Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner.
2022-11-21
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
2022-11-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/18/2022.
2022-10-21
Waiver of right of respondent Atty Gen. of State of Delaware to respond filed.
2022-09-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 3, 2022)

Attorneys

Atty Gen. of State of Delaware
Sean P. Lugg — Respondent
Sean P. Lugg — Respondent
Augustus Evans, Jr.
Augustus Hebrew Evans Jr. — Petitioner
Augustus Hebrew Evans Jr. — Petitioner