Whether the lower court erred in dismissing petitioner's claims for violation of their civil rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983

estions Presened for Review? _ __ AT Whether te district Court's order dengin a certi€icate el = ability for etitaone' 23 5.682265 naive fo vacate, Setaside, et coctect the schas on his aul sale 1@ US.0. 8 2922.6) as dime bacted b se Qt): oe statube of [imibaleons under the Anttherrerisar and Me ctive. Death Penalty Act of (aa, Pub. bs No-/o4132) //0 Stat. 12/4 paucsuant to _ 29 Use. bose P. G0) Vielates the expos facto prescr iptiva of the lnited — States Conttitudsan aS applied in this case, and rs prohshited by Ha ; Ore process clause. _. _ ; £ eter ‘ trhernal Operating Procedure [ules of the Erah i Creu: CoucH DD vc hat States theta petrtion fot rehear ir i$ no reguinds noc a Nete ssa Preteg (sit ty filing & Petihron for. cectrora’ with He US, Supleme loath proscelbled Ha Distret Court as wellas tHe Efght Cocenit Court of Appeals Fram den bediticner a cactificate gf a ppealabslidy as betnn EA ied est US. Supreme Court peeelsent that Jo Coue Rules have. the force af feesy eil vNeaary, Wed Ve 44 SCH 144, 73 £L. J 243 (192 | a tertificatd of Appealabildy and allowance to processed rnfacme pauperis was in _derecd copbliat wi Ms Pa So tne and tabional set forYh in Wilkens Y¥iUS.) 4 tala Med 7 us ‘ 5.ch. 1224 (1474) when this Court interpreted His petdece tat Rule 13.3 o€ He Kules of Coutt of The Unted I | Hg wr Si eme Court g J Stetes | Term 2022. ; _ | Crfford Kinkade ; Petitioner ; ate a < Are —— | Petition for Writ of Certlorar! ! __ Unled She S loa J A pote. Stor g fa Circuit Letitioner Chifbord Keakade respectfully prays theta weit of Ieertiocact issue to reviews He epinion and. judgement entered by tHe lUniled A or TF i? Ctreus n Hoe — Ape! LL, 2022. _ Packres tp The. f peceed ing The caption ok this Case Narves all parties to Phe Proceed ing | tn te Comttwhese judg meat es Sought, te be Pevlewod. a | | :