Whether the trial court erred in denying the defendant's Rule 60(b) motion to vacate the conviction based on evidence of prosecutorial misconduct, racial-bias, and a tainted jury

QUESTIONS PRESENTED I~ Adtached transcripts proves that teral Todae Prosecution [zc KJrowledged fat the [ory is tainted| by linyected Tace-based Subern False aligations] Ia Violattons of Equal Protection Clavse, and the Federal Distrret court Tented Rule 60 (bb) by Claiming it is not Extraordinacy Co eee ee ee ee = pags y AAttached transccipts proves Hat after tral dodge cK nouledyed misconduct by [Fatating the ory] with [injected race-based False allisattuns | He Judge deceived defendant ino scheme to avold 4 mistrial, because he * never implemented He solutvon to : the Problem ustth fhe dury “as he stated he world we ee eet page § 3Evidence ¢ transcripts proves that trial aHorney, Prosecution ¥ trial Tudye* Relied on injected cace to impose a Criminal conviction o sanction pinyri not Just the defendant, but the Law as an institution ,.. the communtly at Large, and demectatte ideal teflected in the process oF our courts” Buck, ide ah 778 2-2 page & Y~ Evidence ¥ atta ched transcripts proves Serious miscarriage oF Justice by trial me Prosecutton ¥ trral Judge conspired with deliberate paisconduct by wrengly J seks “0! Sentenciog 8 imprisoning petitroner by [tainted Sury and injected face bast an False alligatrons] to Violatrons of Equal Protect/an Claus@ 7-77 ° > page 4, And this Potitinner cannot get hts day ia curt ' Please, can I get my day in court» (i)