No. 22-5778
William Paul Burch v. America's Servicing Company, et al.
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: bias civil-procedure constitutional-law constitutional-rights due-process judicial-bias judicial-misconduct judicial-recusal property-rights recusal sanctions
Key Terms:
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2023-01-13
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Should a judge be recused for bias and failure to provide due process?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. If a judge continuously refuses to recuse himself following an extreme amount of verifiable bias should another judge in a close, but separate division, be appointed to determine the correct path for the litigation 2. Should a Circuit Court reverse orders, including horrendous sanctions on multiple cases, that are based on an unconstitutional ruling by a bias judge? 8. Should a judge be recused if he shows bias and refuses to follow the law and give a litigant due process resulting in the loss of property? Il
Docket Entries
2023-01-17
Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner DENIED.
2022-12-28
Motion DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/13/2023.
2022-12-19
Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner.
2022-12-05
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
2022-11-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/2/2022.
2022-10-13
Waiver of right of respondent Chase Bank of Texas to respond filed.
2022-10-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 7, 2022)
Attorneys
Chase Bank of Texas
Marcie L. Schout — Quilling, Selander, Cummiskey & Lownds, PC, Respondent
Marcie L. Schout — Quilling, Selander, Cummiskey & Lownds, PC, Respondent