No. 22-5779
James Michael Johnson v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: conspiracy criminal-procedure due-process evidence evidence-sufficiency jury-instructions money-laundering standard-of-review sufficiency-of-evidence wire-fraud
Key Terms:
Securities
Securities
Latest Conference:
2022-11-04
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the evidence at trial was insufficient to convict the petitioner of wire fraud and money laundering
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. :
Docket Entries
2022-11-07
Petition DENIED.
2022-10-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/4/2022.
2022-10-13
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-10-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 7, 2022)
Attorneys
James Johnson
Peter L. Goldman — Saboura, Goldman & Colombo, P.C., Petitioner
Peter L. Goldman — Saboura, Goldman & Colombo, P.C., Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent