Whether the Oregon State courts violated pro se Petitioner's federal due process and equal protection rights under the Fourteenth Amendment

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the Oregon State courts violated pro se Petitioner’s federal due process and equal protection rights under the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution, by declining to apply the existing Oregon statutory mandate at UTCR 5.050(1), or effectuate the well-established and on-point precedent at Zehr v. Haugen, 318 Or 647, 652-53, 871 P2d 1006 (1994), in order to conduct oral argument so that Petitioner can have his day in court?