Judicial discretion is not a matter of right

QUESTIONS PRESENTED : judicial discretion Rearview on a writ of certiorari is not a matter of right Is judicial discretion discretion is abused power of official to act the dictates of their own Judgment and consciences Cases will be resolved clear Errors conflicts of lowers court of the U.S of Justices In Compelling Reasons Petitions Injury case damages "Physical Emotional Finical "caused by negligent city of Upland city liable because Failed to repair and volitions of government code Discretions is abused when Judicial Trail court actions is arbitrary fanciful, or understandable trail court judge has been discretions abused from Oct-18-2019 first final judgment on August1620212th final judge on Feb-02-2022 during five years -Trial court making their own rules power , the abused the injure person “petitions “For sure abused the Consultations of law — | The United State clear the law. the Citizen affirm that the government of the exists to serve its Citizen of United States The Consultations assigned to Congress responsivity for organizing the executive and Judicial branches raising revenue declaring making all laws necessary for executing these powers. Not discretions power — “judicial discretion “ AMENDMENT 14Rights CUARNTEED Continued Sections 1. All person born or naturalized in the unite stated m and subject to the jurisdictions thereof are citizens of the united states and the State wherein they readied. No State Shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens if United State: nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty or property, without due process of law: nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protractions of the law. AMENDMENT 14Rights : Of-1 Of the Fourtcenth Amendment 4 set said the Dred Scott holding in a sentence “declaratory if ‘ existing right and affirm tive of existing law. ." The First Amendment to The Constitution Guaranties the right to petition their government. BILL OF RIGHT Trial judges Require to the candid in his Sworn answerers to the trial judge s questioning is constitutionally indefensible Supers court Legal s process from Oct-20-2018 till last day august -16-2021 and 2th final Ruling on Feb-2-22 by appeal court denied on first judgement Suggestions for 2th judgment defenders made the ruling peppers documents and Trials court Singed the order— Add more martialsSanctions and attorney feesTrials court and defender’s attorney “all three” city of upland is irregular — Vexations abuse on December 19-2019there is substantial evidence that fraud Crime abused harassment and irregularity from Aguest-21-2018 (Oct-202018) and been continue on a large Scale till august16-2021 — Feb-2-22 singed Trials courtsThe quality and state of being unusual uneven in During court process Supers courts And appeal court appealing final judgement — On April -29-2022 a decision that involved the trial court's use of discretion, the abuse of discretion standard is used by the appellate court in its review. The Justices must exercise considerable discretion in deciding each case BS y the Supreme court of Ca on final decisions On June -29-2022 also with same decisions conflicts Error | Supers court did not mail the decision to petitions — Petitions call to follow up clerk email to petitions | City of Upland Negligent Failed to exercise reasonable care and allowed the dangerous conditions to remain in violations government code 835. city liable fault and city of Upland Negligent alleged city of upland did violations of California Government Code 815.2 damaged petitions life FACTS Based on Code of Conducts for U.S Judges effective March 12-2019 Conon -1A Judge should up hold the integrity and independency Conon A 3. Judge should excess the power of appointment fairly and only basis of merit avoiding unmissably appointment. nepotism and favoritism. A -3 judge should not approve compensations of appointee’s value of the of services endeared A.4 Judge should