No. 22-5789
Rodney Donta Jackson v. Minnesota
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process juror-misconduct post-verdict-hearing post-verdict-hearings public-trial sixth-amendment trial-procedure
Key Terms:
DueProcess FirstAmendment
DueProcess FirstAmendment
Latest Conference:
2022-12-02
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the Sixth Amendment right to a public trial extend to postverdict hearings investigating potential juror misconduct?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED I. Does the Sixth Amendment right to a public trial extend to postverdict hearings investigating potential juror misconduct? I. Is the remedy for a violation of the Sixth Amendment right to a public trial at a post-verdict hearing investigating potential juror misconduct a new trial, or is it merely a redo of the portion of the hearing that had been improperly closed? i STATEMENT OF
Docket Entries
2022-12-05
Petition DENIED.
2022-11-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/2/2022.
2022-11-10
Waiver of right of respondent State of Minnesota to respond filed.
2022-10-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 7, 2022)
Attorneys
Rodney Jackson
Cathryn Young Middlebrook — Minnesota Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
Cathryn Young Middlebrook — Minnesota Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
State of Minnesota
Brittany Dawn Lawonn — Hennepin County Attorney's Office, Respondent
Brittany Dawn Lawonn — Hennepin County Attorney's Office, Respondent