No. 22-5792

Armad Jamall Gatling v. United States

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2022-10-07
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review civil-procedure court-of-appeals dismissal district-court due-process merits restitution sentence-enhancement standing
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2022-11-04
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the Court of Appeals err in dismissing Mr. Gatling's appeal without reviewing its merits?

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. Did the Court of Appeals err in dismissing Mr. Gatling’s appeal without reviewing its merits? 2. Did the district court err when determining the amount of restitution and sentence enhancement? 4

Docket Entries

2022-11-07
Petition DENIED.
2022-10-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/4/2022.
2022-10-13
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
Main DocumentMain Document
2022-10-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 7, 2022)
PetitionPetition

Attorneys

Armad Jamall Gatling
Mark Diamond — Attorney at Law, Petitioner
Mark Diamond — Attorney at Law, Petitioner
United States of America
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent