James Edward Rose v. South Carolina, et al.
Securities
Whether the petitioner's reserved rights under the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) and status as a 'private man' exempt him from criminal prosecution and liability
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ‘ Because zr have heserved MV Rights Per UCC. at (308 Suffitien tlY¥ (on my Drivers Cicense ) asd Qa Private Man Dam nor * Stafutoly, but “Lawful” Z add nerf Cause any berm to anyone for fheit Proterty, r made my | Reservation of Rights Known, ZT even jave He “PEERN after alPeating tn “Special Aopeacance”, Jiving fagitive Moot 7 am “he Benefietat f. Se When ZF brough/ the Lith Coetificate. inte the Gath and Surrendercd if Z discharged all War4e3 agains? me... Cortect 7 ( Belause pow the Prosecutor hes Vo Standin§), They Cen tof Continue Coerte, Tirtaten, Beatme, and feree me inte an untenseionable CGntracr )Reghf@ + Dees n't “without Gredudice UCC. [-308 above | Aloove or belova my S3na ture not enaly fab @ Condition on an untondi tional Gutrat, but lS ReSeNneds all my Mahts Under Actical IL Jndivea, | Voids Police Forel wn (e9s of Crime” and “Probable Cause exist "7? (Yatus v. US. 3at 0.5.44 ps. 408 C944), | © Are all laws not Gmmerdial fer 27 CFR 72.1) and my femedy (S UCC 1-308, Greet ? Liat of Parties! State of South Carolina’ Berkeley County Ser: ff Of ce /Sher tt Daane Lewis; Hill-Finklea Detention Cen fer, R.Markle/ Dean iS Or; Deal ta L. Jefferson; Wilfon (1 ee ly, Bran den D. Lafulli?; TDedd; Bertehy Canty Ja-/ Keepers; Rennie I bussels Paula Leche ln ME lvesue; B. Watson; HentYS Zaring; Heaty Legette; Bad boyz Ba! Bonds; Matv€ Fullel, B0 wilson, Randy Demory, Aatheny Phyall, Ars Jacumin; Secgean’ Deze, , } Officer Stale, K. Shuler; Debra K. Li ttle John; Juche Feiolean; officer A, | L22ene; Gacy Wasrelenuski. -~AlSo0All above Iysted ta Ore ial Cavacitl, ALL CAP'S.