No. 22-5813
Katherine Elizabeth Langhorst v. Texas
IFP
Tags: 4th-amendment constitutional-violation due-process evidence-suppression exclusionary-rule fruit-of-the-poisonous-tree illegal-search ineffective-assistance-of-counsel ineffective-counsel plea-bargaining search-and-seizure trial-procedure
Key Terms:
CriminalProcedure
CriminalProcedure
Latest Conference:
2023-01-06
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Was the evidence seized in this cause/case 'Fruits of The Poisonous Tree'?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED : 1. Was the evidence seized in this cause/case "Fruits of The Poisonous Tree"? 2. Was this conviction obtained by way of illegal search and seizure? 3. Did Ti#ial Gounsel render ineffective assistance during the plea process? : 4. Was Trial Counsel ineffective for not filing a Writ when the the suppression was denied by the trial court? 5. Did the trial court abuse its discreation by denying petitioner's supression hearing? 6: Is this conviction illegal obtained?
Docket Entries
2023-01-09
Petition DENIED.
2022-12-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/6/2023.
2022-09-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 14, 2022)
Attorneys
Katherine Langhorst
Katherine Elizabeth Langhorst — Petitioner