No. 22-582
United States v. Jose Felipe Hernandez-Calvillo, et al.
Relisted (2)
Experienced Counsel
Tags: constitutional-challenge constitutional-law criminal-law criminal-prohibition first-amendment free-speech immigration immigration-law overbreadth-doctrine statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
FirstAmendment Immigration JusticiabilityDoctri
FirstAmendment Immigration JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2023-06-29
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the federal criminal prohibition against conspiring to encourage or induce unlawful immigration is facially unconstitutional on First Amendment overbreadth grounds
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the federal criminal prohibition against conspiring to encourage or induce unlawful immigration, in violation of 8 U.S.C. 13824(a)(1)(A)(iv) and (v)(D), is facially unconstitutional on First Amendment overbreadth grounds. (1)
Docket Entries
2023-08-01
Judgment issued.
2023-06-30
Petition GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of <i>United States</i> v. <i>Hansen</i>, 599 U. S. ___ (2023).
2023-06-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/29/2023.
2023-02-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/24/2023.
2023-02-08
Reply of petitioner United States filed. (Distributed)
2023-01-23
Brief of respondents Jose Felipe Hernandez-Calvillo and Mauro Papalotzi in opposition filed.
2022-12-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 23, 2023)
2022-11-22
Application (22A446) granted by Justice Gorsuch extending the time to file until December 28, 2022.
2022-11-17
Application (22A446) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from November 28, 2022 to December 28, 2022, submitted to Justice Gorsuch.
Attorneys
Jose Felipe Hernandez-Calvillo and Mauro Papalotzi
Mark Christopher Fleming — WilmerHale, Respondent
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Petitioner