No. 22-5820

S. Patrick Mendel v. Liane Randolph, Individually and in Her Official Capacity as Commissioner, California Public Utilities Commission, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2022-10-12
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: civil-rights congressional-preemption criminal-conduct due-process federal-courts federal-enforcement preemption pro-se-petition public-safety transportation transportation-law
Key Terms:
Arbitration
Latest Conference: 2023-03-03 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does this pro se case, alleging fatal systemic failures resulting in the continuing preventable murder of innocent citizens, where literally the lives of tens of thousands of lives, are at risk daily, deserve and demand this Court's immediate attention and supervisory review?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Congress regulates transportation throughout the United States and preempts by law State interference, to insure a competitive marketplace; and importantly to secure the safety of the American people. Significantly, Congress enacted transportation laws, prohibiting the sale and arrangement of passenger transportation to private motor vehicles, today’s rideshare, laws designed to prevent criminal conduct including the murder of innocent unsuspecting citizens, while preempting State interference and assigning by law the enforcement of their statutory scheme upon the federal courts. Since 2015, the Appellate and District Courts, in hundreds of cases, including this one, have failed to recognize, apply or enforce the laws, the Preventatives of the Congressional Transportation scheme leading to the documented and continuing murder of innocent unsuspecting citizens and related criminal and civil misconduct. The solution to stop the criminal conduct is as simple as enforcement of the federal laws, by the federal courts, as delegated by the laws of Congress. QUESTION: Does this pro se case, alleging fatal systemic failures resulting in the continuing preventable murder of innocent citizens, where literally the lives of tens of thousands of lives, are at risk daily, deserve and demand this Court’s immediate attention and supervisory review? 2 pe Tn | | | | I.

Docket Entries

2023-03-06
Rehearing DENIED.
2023-02-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/3/2023.
2023-02-01
2023-01-09
Petition DENIED.
2022-12-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/6/2023.
2022-11-14
Waiver of right of respondents Liane Randolph, et al. to respond filed.
2022-11-03
Application (22A381) denied by Justice Kagan.
2022-10-29
Application (22A381) for injunctive relief, submitted to Justice Kagan.
2022-10-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 14, 2022)

Attorneys

Liane Randolph, et al.
Christofer Charles NolanCalifomia Public Utilities Commission, Respondent
Christofer Charles NolanCalifomia Public Utilities Commission, Respondent
S. Patrick Mendel
S. Patrick Mendel — Petitioner
S. Patrick Mendel — Petitioner