No. 22-5825

Ahmed R. Morning v. Tim Hooper, Warden

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2022-10-14
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-challenge criminal-procedure cruel-and-unusual-punishment due-process judicial-discretion jurisdiction ramos-v-louisiana retroactive-application retroactivity sentencing sentencing-review
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2022-12-02
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the State trial court erred by imposing an unconstitutionally harsh and excessive sentence?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS) PRESENTED 1) Whether the Stotetrial court erred by imposing On untonstitutionally horsh ond excessive sentence? N Whether the holding in Ramos v Louision®, 590 US.— , HOS.CH1340, 306 Ltd.ad 583 (9039), invalidated Lo. RSA 4X(D)Q) . 3) Whether the Stote trial court is without jurisdiction by imposing sentence under unconstitutional Bromute ? La, RSAAHACO)(1): 4) Whether the’substontive cule”exception in Teague V.Lone, 489 US.988, 109 S.Ch 1060, 10% L.Ed. ada (1989), con rule? 5) Whether the retroactive application in Ramosy. Louisiana, 590 US. 1405.04 1390, 306 L.Ed od 583 ( 9090), applies to Pelitioner's case ? Ce

Docket Entries

2022-12-05
Petition DENIED.
2022-11-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/2/2022.
2022-11-14
Waiver of right of respondent Warden, Hooper to respond filed.
2022-10-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 14, 2022)

Attorneys

Ahmed R. Morning
Ahmed R. Morning — Petitioner
Ahmed R. Morning — Petitioner
Warden, Hooper
Shae Gary McPhee Jr.Louisiana Department of Justice, Respondent
Shae Gary McPhee Jr.Louisiana Department of Justice, Respondent