No. 22-584
Children’s Health Defense, et al. v. Food and Drug Administration, et al.
Response Waived
Tags: agency-action article-iii case-or-controversy constitutional-standing injury resource-diversion risk-of-injury standing third-party third-party-injury
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
AdministrativeLaw Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2023-02-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a Constitutionally cognizable case or controversy exists under Article III
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether a Constitutionally cognizable case or controversy exists under Article III when agency action is a substantial factor in the actions of an independent third party that inflicts the injury? 2. Whether a Constitutionally cognizable case or controversy exists under Article III when agency action increases the risk of injury? 3. Whether a Constitutionally cognizable case or controversy exists under Article III when agency action causes an organization to divert resources for prelitigation investigation of the agency’s action?
Docket Entries
2023-02-21
Petition DENIED.
2023-02-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/17/2023.
2023-01-23
Waiver of right of respondent Food and Drug Administration to respond filed.
2022-12-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 23, 2023)
Attorneys
Children’s Health Defense, et al.
Robert Edward Barnes — Barnes law, Petitioner
Robert Edward Barnes — Barnes law, Petitioner
Food and Drug Administration
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent