No. 22-5841

Harry Sharod James v. United States

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2022-10-14
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-procedure commerce-clause confrontation-clause constitutional-authority district-court filing-fee judicial-tax procedural-discretion standing subject-matter-jurisdiction
Key Terms:
Securities
Latest Conference: 2022-11-18
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit and the United States District Court of North Carolina, Eastern District abuse its discretion by not establishing subject-matter-jurisdiction, once it was challenged by petitioner via motion?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED V)Did phe WWETED STATES Coun OF APPEALS FORTHE FouRTH CTHAGET and The ‘UNITED STATES DISTRLCT CouRT OF NORTH CARGLIAL " EASTERN DISTRICT abuse its discretion bu not esrablis hing Subyect Matter Jucis Achon, once it WAS Challenged ~ by pettioner via motion ? &) Does Congress hove the Lawhd authority +o use The Commerce Chause " oe tne Consttution to Collect A Judicial Tex” ca the Corrs 3F O Filtag Fee Far the dudiciat Process ?

Docket Entries

2022-11-21
Petition DENIED.
2022-11-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/18/2022.
2022-10-25
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-10-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 14, 2022)

Attorneys

Harry James
Harry Sharod James — Petitioner
Harry Sharod James — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent