Did the communications between Respondents' Attorneys and the Chief Sweeny on the Judge's Personal Cell Phone violate the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment?

No question identified. : _ Did the Communication s between Respondents Attorneys _oilnd TIE OCtef Siveeney ON the. Todge Persona) Lei) Pbene the ty Pafde. comm UNitawch cb Pade 2 ef the Ta nsctieFor. the feu Wear. in en Tufy PAG AERA HEH he Off tre tansércith ‘Di duet Communication between the Tubde and The £es Pon Jent Vislatta the Setitene? Sikibewy SteRA fifi, amin Amen a Dt Table ef clients ‘ / . min ita. CNo Sen 4 By wo. . 1 aUelet telly \ I, QVE SHitn xf Loe NT EE MOM 1S te ctf tl AOE oo Il. Took of CONTENTS Tenement ti ay oh LY, OFiNjeN $ Bele pee meee] | Ver, Stahinent of ThE CASe weeny i i <r “AN a4 5 4 ' . ey Vint, Rease 5 TEL GATING tye MAT Ay | Zh COnClySion. von B . Xe APPEN SX EO th EN a ee! IZ State of yon vy, | Mew YOIKCOUH ag IS Nepecs Pate SPH mM bE P aR RORD Aprcals RLCISion 53 ? . LEY petitlan for write of Certorari Gover nel with his ligvienant Sovernor A\vit\ Moogy , for Freedom Party fer tig New York GUbernstora __and litltenalt Jubernatenial general ejection essa estecttuly Petitions twis Couch for a writ of Certiocay, feyitw the Tuddment of tye STate oF New yaoi : COUP OF AL PEQ\S yecisedang Enteled on twenty-second day of ~ IV. OPswiens Below The decisttny by the state of Mem york avit of Appeals Entered 4 [AX] ACAR denying MestoPA’ direct apPeal without Coors , Ufon the Giound that vo Substantial Constitutional] Motion for aA STAY. A copy of the decigion 15 Attact . Ve Jurisdiction MO ST¢R. ” petition fo heating i the state of Men~yolis Curt OF APPEALS was Jenied on Garbo mestoka Saves twig Gourds _— BAL Timely leg TAS. PETE for a wit af Cembio rat . “within nipety days of Thi stadt of Meher Cour of Appeals 360 Stan and op ef Dates daalaor. “ oe VE Constitutional provisions | untied S}ates Constitutioy Amendment NO _persen Shalt pe tli to ANS wer fof 4 Capital of Oth OL Wise A farmeus CMM, Unless On A Presentment of tndictmen 4 OF 4 Ofond Tury eNCEPE Lin cases Atising in tye land or nag fares OF iin the Mita, When ih Actua | Set Vite. Sn time of wat of Public danger? ner Shall Any Persen be SWintect tof ti, SAME Offense te be Put tuace iM Teopardy) og pip, ef lin: : ROL Shall ef) Are Eteeerhy be TAKEN for PUbife Se; Without Just COM PEN Sarton, Uiited STATES “Constitytion , AME idm ent ATV re et eee =— ty the Jurisdiction neeltofs aft Citinens of the United Stes ANG of the State Wheteih they festde , Ny Statt Shall make OF Enforce ay jaw which Shall abridge the privileses of _ . Amy StA}e deeeive apy Pelson o£ tite ibe. or ate Peery, Witheys dye PTeLcess eg LAW: Wer deny 4 ANY PEPeain ala co ve