Did the Portland US Bankruptcy Court err in dismissing the adversary filings of Webster, failing to sustain his prior discharge after previously performing duties of trustee, administering all priority claims accountable to the estate in 2011-2012 for Azonia Haney without complaint or objection

Question Presented 1. Did Portland US Bankruptcy Court error, primarily “Judge” Peter McKittrick when he dismissed the adversary filings of Webster, failing to sustain his prior discharge after previously performing duties of trustee, administering all priority claims accountable to the estate in 20112012 for Azonia Haney without complaint or objection, first in US District Court with the (TRO) granted by Judge King on 9/1/2011, and later full-discharge after deadline for Proof of Claims . with the bar date of 7/16/2012 that came and went, then accordingly “Trustee” Peter McKittrick disbursed assets providing relief for Mrs. Haney to retain and redeem the Tracts of Land in her Statement_of Intention filed 3/15/2012 Doc 12 for setoff, a counter-claim securing the homestead away from Countrywide, KeyBank, Bank of America NA, and Real Time Solutions, for consideration $0.00 and they would abandon the burdensome properties of inconsequential value as clawback to the Haney-Webster Estates, administering the conflicting accounts for parties of interest as required, as some were holding duplicate claims against the Haney Tracts situs of: 8707 SE 347% Avenue Boring Oregon, a conflict appearing to be fraud, along with the , more recent Haney Bankruptcy Case # 18-33463-thp13 where Real Time Solutions along with Indenture Trustee The Bank of New York Mellon with their Exhibit A demonstrate the paper trail of Security Instruments connected to the Original Countrywide Loan and this case where SPS has presented similar claims, seven years after total discharge ten years ago, and once again this this year April 22, 2022 making the claims against Webster by SPS invalid on their face? 1| Page Application No. 21A622 Writ for True Bill of Certiorari de novo webster v. SPS ay ew MEO