Is it true that the courts erred by allowing the USBK Court Division Portland, Oregon and their attorneys to violate webster's due-process-rights allowing respondents' false-claims to stand in a federal bankruptcy-court proceeding as secured-and-unsecured-creditors without perfected-claims assisting pretend-creditors to foreclosure on the farm but instead assisting in the cover-up by attempting to dismiss webster's bankruptcy, while under the protections of 18-usc-152-4 knowingly and fraudulently presents any false-claim for proof against the estate of a debtor?

Questions Presented | 1. Is it true, that the courts errored by allowing the USBK Court Division Portland, Oregon : and their attorney's to violate webster’s “Due Process Rights” allowing Respondents “false | claims” to stand in a federal bankruptcy court proceeding, as “Secured and Unsecured 7 Creditors” without perfected claims assisting pretend creditors to “FORECLOUSURE” on the farm | but instead assisting in the cover-up by attempting to dismiss webster’s bankruptcy, while under | the protections of 18 USC 152(4), knowingly and fraudulently presents any false claim for proof | against the estate of a debtor? | | 2. Is it true, the courts errored by dismissing webster’s lawfully filed bankruptcy case | without discharge, and without dispute of webster’s affidavit and Motion for Summary Judgement, also requiring full-discharge by force majeure on April 15, 2020 due to COVID 19 | and it’s devastating effects to the economies, the supply chains, now causing major disruptions with the effects of sever hyper-inflation all around the world, preventing normal commerce? | | | | 1| Page Application No. 21A621 Petition for a Writ of Certiorari de novo webster v. USDCDO