No. 22-5862
Gregory Ramos v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appeal constitutional-right criminal-procedure due-process effective-assistance-of-counsel habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel second-circuit sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2022-11-18
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Second Circuit's determination that Petitioner was not denied his right to the effective assistance of counsel consistent with the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution was correct
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the Second Circuit’s determination that Petitioner was not denied his right to the effective assistance of counsel consistent with the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution was correct. i
Docket Entries
2022-11-21
Petition DENIED.
2022-11-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/18/2022.
2022-10-27
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-10-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 17, 2022)
2022-08-17
Application (22A140) granted by Justice Sotomayor extending the time to file until October 14, 2022.
2022-08-10
Application (22A140) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from August 15, 2022 to October 14, 2022, submitted to Justice Sotomayor.
Attorneys
Gregory Ramos
Herbert L. Greenman — Herbert L. Greenman, Petitioner
Herbert L. Greenman — Herbert L. Greenman, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent