No. 22-5865
Charles Smith v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appeal appellate-procedure criminal-conviction criminal-procedure jurisdiction jurisdictional-defect ninth-circuit plea-agreement sentencing waiver
Key Terms:
FifthAmendment
FifthAmendment
Latest Conference:
2022-11-18
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Ninth Circuit erred in dismissing the appeal
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the Ninth Circuit erred in dismissing the appeal when Mr. Smith’s plea agreement contains a count of conviction and resulting sentence that is no longer a crime, and an illegal sentence is a jurisdictional defect that is not waivable? -ii
Docket Entries
2022-11-21
Petition DENIED.
2022-11-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/18/2022.
2022-10-27
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-10-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 17, 2022)
Attorneys
Charles Smith
Marisa Conroy — Law Office of Marisa L. D. Conroy, Petitioner
Marisa Conroy — Law Office of Marisa L. D. Conroy, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent