Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a Hobbs Act conviction can support a violation of 18 U.S.C. §924(c) under the categorical approach
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED This Court's should Grant this certiorari etition, | Vacate the judgment below, and Remand (cvR), in or| der to allow the court of appeals to decide in light of United States v. Taylor, 596 U.S. ,» 142 S.Ct. 2015, 213 Lied. 2d. 349 (2022), whether reasonable , jurist-could debate if this Petitioner's Hobbs Act conviction can support a violation of Title 18 U.S.C. §924(c) under this Court's "categorical approach" , jurisdiction. : This Court should Grant Petitioner a COA, Vacate thé lower courts’ denial of his constitutional claim under United States v. Davis, 588 U.S. _ (2019), and Remand the case to the lower appellate court to re-— solve whether the district court erred in denying-him relief on the unconstitutionally vague §924(c) law as applied to Petitioner.:
2023-03-03
Reply of petitioner Gregory A. Milton filed. (Distributed)
2023-02-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/17/2023.
2023-02-08
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2022-12-23
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including February 8, 2023.
2022-12-22
Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 9, 2023 to February 8, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2022-12-02
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 9, 2023.
2022-12-01
Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 9, 2022 to January 9, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2022-11-09
Response Requested. (Due December 9, 2022)
2022-11-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/18/2022.
2022-10-27
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-10-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 17, 2022)