No. 22-5885
Christopher Surles v. Warden, Limestone Correctional Facility, et al.
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: appeals appellate-jurisdiction civil-procedure due-process federal-government federal-procedure notice-of-appeal procedural-rules standing time-limitation time-limits united-states-agency
Key Terms:
Securities Immigration
Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2023-03-31
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the time limit for filing a notice of appeal is extended when the United States or an agency of the United States is a party?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
estions Preseated for Review = | of Moepeal (AppendisZ)..does thet make the United States a pack) da the sppeele | . Disteis Jd igeR Mavic Proctuc anagent of the_tlaited Stefes. 2 a | * whetisthetime limitfocthe Liling of a notice. of Appeal when dhe United __ | tattS_or an igenes of the United stetes isa pacty ? enn __ | * Ls the Hime betweer ApNF [2022 theo 3)84)2022 appronimetely LE days potest) $$$ | ‘ Was-the oletice of Appeal (
Docket Entries
2023-04-03
Rehearing DENIED.
2023-03-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/31/2023.
2023-02-01
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2023-01-09
Petition DENIED.
2022-12-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/6/2023.
2022-11-15
Waiver of right of respondent Warden, Limestone Correctional Facility, et al. to respond filed.
2022-08-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 21, 2022)
Attorneys
Warden, Limestone Correctional Facility, et al.
David Hunter Hamm — Office of the Alabama Attorney General, Respondent
David Hunter Hamm — Office of the Alabama Attorney General, Respondent