No. 22-5887
Joseph Michael DeGraw v. Ricky D. Dixon, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights due-process habeas-corpus judicial-discretion pro-se procedural-construction section-2254 section-2255 standing statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus Securities
HabeasCorpus Securities
Latest Conference:
2022-11-18
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether federal courts should construe pro se state prisoner pleadings under 28 U.S.C. 2254 using the same standard as 28 U.S.C. 2255 federal prisoner pleadings
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the Federal Courts should, sua sponte, construe a state prisoner’s : . pro se filed pleadings, in 28 U.S.C. Section 2254 proceedings, citing the wrong rule, . as properly filed under the appropriate rule, which is already mandated to be done with pleadings filed by federal prisoners filing pro se under 28 U.S.C. Section 2255, pursuant to Andrew v. United States, 373 U.S. 334, 83S. Ct. 1236, 10 L. Ed. 2d 383 (1963)? : . ii
Docket Entries
2022-11-21
Petition DENIED.
2022-11-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/18/2022.
2022-11-01
Waiver of right of respondent Ricky D. Dixon to respond filed.
2022-08-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 21, 2022)
2022-07-29
Application (22A81) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until August 23, 2022.
2022-07-20
Application (22A81) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from July 24, 2022 to September 22, 2022, submitted to Justice Thomas.
Attorneys
Joseph Michael DeGraw
Joseph Michael DeGraw — Petitioner
Ricky D. Dixon
Celia A. Terenzio — Respondent