No. 22-5890
Ronald William Brooks v. United States
Tags: appellate-waiver constitutional-challenge constitutional-law criminal-procedure due-process habeas-corpus miscarriage-of-justice plea-agreement plea-bargaining post-conviction-relief section-2255
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2022-11-18
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a boilerplate waiver of appellate and post-conviction rights bars a claim under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 that the defendant stands convicted of a non-existent or unconstitutional crime
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the boilerplate waiver of Petitioner’s appellate and post-conviction rights contained within his plea agreement bars his claim under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 that he stands convicted of a non-existent or substantively unconstitutional crime. Il DIRECTLY
Docket Entries
2022-11-21
Petition DENIED.
2022-11-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/18/2022.
2022-10-31
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-10-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 23, 2022)
Attorneys
Ronald William Brooks
James Matthew Wright — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
James Matthew Wright — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent