Did the Circuit Court, Court of Special Appeals, and the Court of Appeals err in violations against the Petitioner's rights in the 14th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Did the Circuit Court, Court of Special Appeals, and the _ Court of Appeals err in violations against the Petitioner’s rights in the 14th. Amendment to the Constitution of the United States? 2. Did the Circuit Court err in not giving a written judicial decision with a stated rationale to Petitioner’s Motions? 3. Did the Circuit Court, Court of Special Appeals, and the Court of Appeals apply the Maryland Rules in Petitioner’s case in accordance with the law? QUESTIONS 1. Did the Circuit Court, Court of Special Appeals, and the Court of Appeals err in violations against the Petitioner’s rights in the 14th. Amendment to the Constitution of the United States? Yes. : THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT TO THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES in the United States Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution, Procedural Due Process, it states Procedural Due Process guarantees fairness to , individuals. The right to be heard, and to be given a judicial decision with a stated rationale. ; In the United States Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution, State Action, it states and_Declares a state cannot make or enforce any taw that abridges the privileges or immunities of a citizen. We are a Nation Of Laws. The United States Constitution written laws and rights takes precedence over any states written laws. Every state within the United States, must govern its steps to be in total compliance with the ultimate laws, The Constitution of the United States. In Procedural Due Process, it guarantees : fairness to individuals. It guarantees the right to be heard, and given a judicial decision with a stated rationale. The Petitioner was not heard, neither was any rationale on the missed motion spoken or written. This simply did not occur.. This is a violation of the Petitioners Constitutional Rights. The Rights of a United States citizen that has a right to walk in. it can, and will be argued, the rendering of the Petitioners Motions Moot due the presiding Judge, Judge Michael Pearson missing the motions resulting in no final judgment, causing there to no longer be any controversies between the parties, by no means constitute fairness to the ; Petitioner. The Motions were filed, each must have a rendered judgment. The Petitioner was not heard. The Petitioner will continue to state this is an injustice, and against the rights the Petitioner has. This is a violation to the Petitioners United States Constitutional Rights. 2. Did the Circuit Court err in not giving a stated judicial decision with a stated rationale to Petitioner’s Motions? Yes. The Court abridged the privileges and rights of the Petitioner by diminishing, shortening, and disregarding the importance of being heard. 3. Did the Circuit Court, Court of Special Appeals, and the Court of Appeals apply the Maryland Rules in Petitioner’s case in accordance with the law? No. The applicable laws and Maryland Rules that apply, were not applied in accordance to the law in this case.