No. 22-5908

Giles McGhee v. Darrel Vannoy, Warden

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2022-10-26
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-procedure due-process fifth-amendment fourteenth-amendment in-re-winship ineffective-assistance jackson-v-virginia reasonable-doubt sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
DueProcess Privacy
Latest Conference: 2023-01-06
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the State fail to meet its burden of proof beyond a reasonable doubt that Mr. McGhee was guilty of two Counts of First Degree Murder?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED , A. Reasonable jurists would determine that Mr. McGhee was denied his right to Due Process of Law under the Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution where the State failed to meet its burden of proof beyond a reasonable doubt that Mr. McGhee was gnilty of two Counts of First Degree Murder. Jackson v. Virginia; In re: Winship; Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution.; : 2. Reasonable jurists would determine that Mr. McGhee was denied his right to Due Process of Law under the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution where he was denied effective assistance of trial counsd.

Docket Entries

2023-01-09
Petition DENIED.
2022-12-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/6/2023.
2022-11-15
Waiver of right of respondent Darrel Vannoy, Warden to respond filed.
2022-10-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 25, 2022)

Attorneys

Darrel Vannoy, Warden
Zachary T. Daniels — Respondent
Zachary T. Daniels — Respondent
Giles McGhee
Giles McGhee — Petitioner
Giles McGhee — Petitioner