No. 22-5913
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: circuit-court-interpretation continuity extortion fund-freezing hj-standard judicial-review legal-standard ongoing-entity predicate-acts regular-way-of-doing-business rico rico-continuity
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity
SocialSecurity
Latest Conference:
2023-03-24
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the DC Circuit's statement on RICO continuity directly contradict the HJ standard?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Does the DC Circuit’s statement on RICO continuity directly contradict the HJ standard: . “the threat of continuity may be established by showing that the predicate acts or offenses are part of an ongoing entity's regular way of doing business?’ YES 2. Is the DC Circuit’s statement on RICO continuity even a legal standard? NO 8. Was the trial court’s declaration of “entirely lawful,” applied to. the freezing of the $657k Fund in order to extract a $100k claim, erroneous and blind to obvious extortion? YES
Docket Entries
2023-03-27
Rehearing DENIED. Justice Jackson took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2023-03-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/24/2023.
2023-02-03
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2023-01-09
Petition DENIED. Justice Jackson took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2022-12-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/6/2023.
2022-04-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 25, 2022)
Attorneys
John Berman
John Berman — Petitioner