No. 22-5914
Dominique Lamar Johnson v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 18-usc-3583 administrative-violations criminal-procedure criminal-supervision district-court-discretion due-process liberty liberty-deprivation sentencing sentencing-guidelines statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
Securities
Securities
Latest Conference:
2022-12-02
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the District Court acted excessively by sentencing Petitioner to a sentence two and half times above the supervision guideline range for administrative violations and deprived the Petitioner of liberty within the terms of 18 U.S.C. 3583 (c) and (d)
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether the District Court acted excessively by sentencing Petitioner to a sentence two and half times above the supervision guideline range for administrative violations and deprived the Petitioner of liberty within the terms of 18 U.S.C. 3583 (c) and (d). 1. ;
Docket Entries
2022-12-05
Petition DENIED.
2022-11-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/2/2022.
2022-11-02
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2022-10-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 25, 2022)
Attorneys
Dominique Johnson
James Steven Hershberger — Petitioner
United States of America
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent