Whether the district court lacked subject-matter and personal jurisdiction in the petitioner's criminal proceedings

No question identified. : pitti nuh Gras’ touch of 4 ar | 10. De i SS | Lit oF Rages i rane ace ena — ane COSo ON Ww over PAQe. $$ li _— . Grades v. Aowoyw Loctell pene’ lUnvied ‘Oc = “Arch Por ot \A0. Ch a 4 x P04 — ——— Ce ee SS —} — i | 7 | | ARLE OE CONTENTS a Congkdurion Bnd Hoheory Vrowsion LON OIN2 A pooce Z poten He OS2 9000 a Rea DOS Dor granting he Wert sooo Mk () LAD np900 VO | | | | | | | . | | | ; | | | | 7 | | | _ | a , | ARLE OF _D ADRITUE Cite) | Ca PAGE NUMBER Ey parte Baw ii Us. |, 5H 78a BE MeClotlonv.Cacland. 2171 U8 5 _ 268.232.8308 CL.BOI (IIb | | | a a | | | | . | | IN We | K NUT OE THE UNiTeh rete | “VeTiTion FOR WRIT OF CERTIORAR L Vabidronoc cospecdCully proud Hat 0 hoc of Certiorart (sub to tows ! i hamoat laelow. | \) | Uk (TION i For case Srom Fedorak Cyuckss Thy dake on whieh We glad ireut | v DINO Debtor Pac chvarina wos Yorely yd AO Deon’ 0 ; [The ucisduchod of As Court lhowpkod Under 2% USCS. \254Q). Q daront as oNkered OA ADIN 22 | | 4 ; | CONSTITUTIONAL OND STATUTDR | eB: ONS INNO pata Om ondmon | | | | . | | | | | | a | | | | n> / | ie a as ‘Win Quae M, 2022 Podrhonor Pid am brid | in Dismiss. lade ra! dry United Cares Nenater Chure Ror aw Didricd Of Minne. ratuantay y1V7 \). Waited & ick COUCH \Udage GOAN IR Taher wolhout ep (0buSe 40 | Okg a ion. 3 On Qeober 11,2022, Debtor Filed O pho or 4. bored Of Mandamus @awshg ( onrn and Oicecting Whe district judge to take Qckivn Too Unidad Sokes Court oe Appeals for he Avis ad iret Opn2aA No. 29-303 TOn Oot 11,2022, Tro Era Cictuit nwa dhe Poon F® laborer Seeks rovigw of the \\aeke ' cis dacisibd Vig work of cochorart. HO ro Liat colt (aacding Migs 0 CP No. O82 apoe1. “ b) | REASONS FOR GRANTING THe Petition | Landing aoe Gustrict uaa Sohn K Tun \$ Debbonar's' mortda +o Aisrngs', whreh $ predicated on his UN\owohul Osenhon , United tates bistrict Cour+ Fudge Adha RTunhom acted without SuR\actMatter ANA Perwnal yurcsOUCEIO IN PaekHorer's crimiad pro@ Credhings, Spocificadly, judge Tuahein resided ver O Dada + eral in whieh the United Stotes Ported to geek & grand art INCICHANE AS MAQuiced by We pastrurion dnd laws “of Yug pa See US. District Court Cri. Ny. O1-(4le \), CISHICE OF Minnesota, a+. Indictment q Grand uri inductmont Is both a PiLraquiStte > garding Prosewstion o_ (4) | | ONG ¢ yucisgictogal Moder ve exporte | The distric} court's refusal 40 OOU, reat Daribioner's (bt iON yenen, Ref yea + aust tec I$suance of AW cored 1 MeClailony. Coclond 21 US. WB 739,308 Ch SOLMAID), HeraPore the court Dalow shouldve sua NR wr OF Mandamus. a | | CONCLUSION _ Yebitner hurl Prays Are Deron Por vortt Oo cochorati 1s ranked | Antwoyn Tarrell (paneer submecs Yiis Daven for woe Op Grorart OA Ms Ody ay Of October , 2022. Resquctfully Subritted, Noke dl? r0\\a\ 22 a (t)