No. 22-5927

Jonathan Lee Oliver v. United States

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2022-10-27
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: due-process fifth-amendment judicial-procedure jury-trial non-jury-proceeding preponderance-of-evidence sixth-amendment supervised-release
Key Terms:
DueProcess FifthAmendment JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2022-12-02
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the district court's unindicted, non-jury, preponderance of the evidence fact-finding that Mr. Oliver committed a new federal offense to conclude Mr. Oliver violated a condition of his supervised release violate the Fifth and Sixth Amendments?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED Did the district court’s unindicted, non-jury, preponderance of the evidence fact-finding that Mr. Oliver committed a new federal offense to conclude Mr. Oliver violated a condition of his supervised release violate the Fifth and Sixth Amendments? When serving a term of supervised release, did Mr. Oliver’s false statements on financial disclosure forms required by the United States Probation Office fall under the “judicial procedure” exception in 18 U.S.C. §1001(b)? ii

Docket Entries

2022-12-05
Petition DENIED.
2022-11-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/2/2022.
2022-11-02
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-10-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 28, 2022)

Attorneys

Jonathan Lee Oliver
John Palmer RhodesFederal Defenders of Montana, Petitioner
John Palmer RhodesFederal Defenders of Montana, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent