Whether the federal court had jurisdiction to hear the case against the hospital and Department of Labor

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Den (Ipyiul 9 2029 Fideral Creret Count Cane 21-9935 tumdawm mf Caos Breanne yuundlietion Bel Feclenal Places Canny (Uot Louw MKe UA Hospital + OWL P’ CDapt of Labor) GO J xplain on page & Atuon AGa.rt amd (Nooclreck Mabe etal. (juat [Reortnwat ob JD act Dmpineh amal Me Spame C45, 66,7 dma Mure Domagey On Besth Gamo LR opt, Uniad ¥ IO fingers Puumb Uterkraas um legs ~ TNe Dector Sarpn atD me, Sauna Conditia Matting mep, dogs uwek UD) waiter’ fp HOARD Clelaiping, anc SUWL buen A rcuce MA Doetmasy Agqros that 24 ML SURGES FouD DR Michelle octimendon who dud Me Surgery P38?