No. 22-5934

Gemar Morgan v. United States

Lower Court: Sixth Circuit
Docketed: 2022-10-28
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: compassionate-release constitutional-due-process covid-19 criminal-justice-reform first-step-act health-conditions judicial-discretion retroactive-application sentence-modification sentencing-reform sentencing-reform-act statutory-interpretation
Latest Conference: 2022-12-02
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the district court erred in denying the petitioner's motion for compassionate release under the First Step Act, in light of the petitioner's health conditions and the COVID-19 pandemic

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

No question identified. : | ® a >. 2PREME, Coie OF THe CISEre —2TATE = siz lourreh Sraree le & yA 2 Ce (CE) Cu) ~ APPLICABLE Tome PEeETONS * = jd HERA)? B 7. g f AMEMN ISAT 7009 = Sate pe CE Bore Ah 8262! pmparcoa) ? oe: tHE BE} Pra CONVICTIONS Fors vro a) taney IR KZ ‘om EL Oslo ARON S HIF FEREAT EAM Os | bs bontcaid anys 20er 7 [De 89.0, SHIH coatg AO) DERE AS dal TNE REMAR | bN2TreK. 2 4 1'2(e APPLICABLE Tews _P. Pee rok, C_ a tea | | Re | —£ 56> UNITE SraTE S28 5OB8_ S. BG,ATY 322 . F > 22. AUD IZA E asaeaas) | ssosarre: [rue 2-LTHA | SENTENCE REFORMACT EISELE Comman SS COMPLIANCE NT sceor THE Co sthe TiS SF COM MENTARY ANG THE Gorhig~ | OnE INE ZT ARP ABE tACoNot 8 TENT THAT TALON AC Ue LL iF Plc m-r. Nil OLAV" BUtA)'2¢e> APPLICAPLE Tz _ _ | a st 2D TZTO CAD. ols Ny A CTBEOOZ Te | ro / u ADN FEREBRM BIG@NTS TO MICHIGAN) NETEEMTME A PARSOn\ a . | ; los ri. RIG RESTOREK AS A” Not’ Poise: OXcEZCE I " fo SERVE ON Noere Lee Aibou) AALA RK pO bet AUS Ani® 1% TAINEPENBEST LEGA, Fees | THE KeaEm&a\ OF OPTALTOAS | SS AJOT AckSnionY BAGS lone c \ ue APP nis BRrekNowe = ~ = : lesnce: ONSTLTIOTAR Tre RevtGu.) oF Tas Spree | AUF | ; i vl ENEQRCRMBA ANS ANSILATLOAL O Z IK Ni | NAR 20 6431 (ao V20 ) tae WE Loma Conk 2 a \ Be 4 Papi oF Commeusres 0. QB > Oe _ . [ werzanls Pecssireh tox Kove) CTA TIONOF THE OETEN OF ORDERS URTSSTOTZON STATEMENT IO CONCTSRE STATEMENT & ARGUMENT I Con STON : : IAEErhave-r “To Proosen ral Toema Papers 18-22 EXSTBIT STokCeMGAST § ORDERS 2 BBD ti : RereRewce fax 86S .10-I"10F nize Perr 3B oe a SE : NC nea Sa. PAGE |r Ve N95 2599S, 2500992) as ax A 522 ABS Ord io 1 (19 S94 : 5 = | OLIIAIA~MABTINEZ vi i He Wile ~17, 36-37 lncwazt 221349. S64, 2191 (2009 1O~)7, 34h 5.35 le Eo v. Kosei 2% 5510S 205,AT 212 (2007) POL Io. le PLE 2 5 j) 200 (199 . lx-c PTEMEMNT VISEO Vi 13,5 $5 913 (199 1 | PINSON v. 23 508 US 3o(1 99? 0 } * I} ? ZAMS 43 . LF, 1992. i =EZ 36°-4O ; | anaer0 3:4. 5% IG) F Ach 6GTG. 70 \Jo ee 1999) LO-1T , TH . TELTAM Vi t3S32 JOOO U5: APPLE B7Si (G78 2000 loO-i lf alike 122 BOO F.3d 720 (ar. 20! ios t? | at 10-17 tl Sahl 5 66) KEK APPX 313( 2016 CIR. -YUO 10-177 | Srv. JOR 1.32572 FEN, APPX 497 (20 1 Gézz 26-4 ius.v. Tere? 2020 une. APP. LeVTS 15474 (2000 te) ; Ss 5 : 6 & cme : | BV. Fouverse: 615 E24 715 (20D bz) 1o~ 177 le 7 HATA oni an 565 FEN. APPX 345 (2014 Glbne ) 1-17, 329 eV. FLEMING oo BF 3d 764 (2018 6'AzR 29 | , ’ a ABD 3! EN. APP O14 @T'h7e ) 10-17, 39 | 3 HA ARS A 482( 9619 GT" 10-17,/382 | ‘ KE TCCARS a4 iC) 2(2D A z O. | DV WOLIZNS 33 BAls Fs Ole Sze, A> m7 38 . He los , WALASH % $5 154 Ni APPX. <3,” 578 (201g ) 1O-V] 34 : . Vv WASTER 37 BID F 3d 10g ALS a | Soc . ene apices (ned 3 (O15 B35 i} :9.C. 221 MEAN c = } 3,35 ee ene barstews 101 2H 3S 18 56.3924 (42) Bo,35 WS.C: (e. 34 283 4.0.8 4 in36Q-3% , US. 5 Ce nO 2 iBOs.c. PPX. Ni: 177 ; . ene 150: 829 0994 Derm) BH BS a ee RES .KAPP.2 Bue 352 4O OT eS FEN Rapp. P Rue arp) ESR COP, Rove Do BY BG | SuPREME Court Rot& 10(e)4(> L101) —_|Surnem’ Court Ruck 2 C2) OS: Cy 25 210 262 Lemmy Gig) 2 2G L Top Me (D) OT HHO ky dks ° Vion nn TE lyanr(ed(a ey € WAL? eon, nie 0 17, 34-4 | Tp ene oes [or 2 7 + Bs thay. oa 1 > in : -f . as) 7 ¢ i Gen J x. o) {$i THE PAK Ss ( | — PRO Se Il TWaaws 22h A ors TOA RIE | RESPOAKEALT vit CemArR MoBGAn ASR ZN IG-ch242599 | . . SA TUSGEMERT 0 be 2 | dammeh Stats > DWAGE, . DAVIN M.LAwSOn o Ral Nrore EF Mrerizean. | ‘PRO Se : Ca=mA VIBIRGA &, = Zz ° oa ll . arte AT SIDASEMEAT 3s = ° ‘ lI METIS ATE (a) a | GES 5 LAL, Rocers AND OTRANCH = s H pate TE Se CoOORT OF APPENLS ta We Ge “Cze. a” Re Sea etic aed Bae” SOE ake! . Chi CATAL ION pi THe OPINTZAAL £ OBS S _ ; coemar WMOTEGSA WA STEN BWTATE & > : : | “19 -C£20259 ; AS oF Toba @\1| 2022. THEBES ~ = | 6 OFETCLAL OR OF RE Or TH BEESREACK FoR Tw7S CASE To TRIAL TRANSCRIPTS, | . # ao tt becl6er* 1g & NG » | Lt SENTENCING, TRANSCBIPTS = Aash, uv a . | | SGaEZAG ESA a 4 RIVMzAlA Amoi . lc inal = ZH S ° a . mye COPIA Toy, Ag Ad NPHPILTSHEb OPTAZeAN boc sey q : IF Ad

Docket Entries

2022-12-05
Petition DENIED.
2022-11-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/2/2022.
2022-11-03
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-09-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 28, 2022)

Attorneys

Gemar Morgan
Gemar Morgan — Petitioner
Gemar Morgan — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent