Prince Jones v. District of Columbia, et al.
Securities Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Can D.C. Superior Court Judges exercise Statutory Jurisdiction under the color of Article III judicial Power, when Article III does not provide a Statutory Jurisdiction
QUESTIONS) PRESENTED . 1. Can D.C. Superior Court Juclges exercise Steclvtury Jonsdicton under +he color oF Article TIE jodheial Power, when Arhcle Tt does not provide a Staturory Sorigadictim, Ai Can D.C. Superar Court Ioalges exercise Stalvtory | Jonsdicttion over eetvhoner personally when pe hone ig not a Statetery persm, 15a pegole under the Comma Law and Arhcle TL judicial Power oloes not pronde fel Statutery jonsdichon, 3. Can DiC. Supernor Court Judges and the government Conceal yas Avhela AIL Jonsdictan, its Article TOL Standing and the -true nature ond cause of ach agamst “petrtener anal rts yodgments be lawful and binding, 4. Can Congress ole posit Artele | begisloct ‘Power into a now Constitutioal enhty, ex Comes }) am ol Such cleposit not be mM wolahon of Arhcle | sectim 8 Clovse 11 excluswe tegislatim clause over the DistnetS. Can pethmer Apply ms indindval Tenth Amendment Right “fo tne Defacko Stote government oF the BCs Corporation Camel ond Mayor, who enact D\C, CODE wwoythat q Congress om Senate. 6. \5 petroner entiited ~bo recover damages From D.C. governmuat ater \& has leecen hetermmned loy DiC. Court of Appeals, that the government violated petrtoners “Fourth Amendment Right. 7, 15 pethoer enhtted to recover Compensahar and clamages From Di government who setzed without warrant petitioners private property and hen forferted it from petrtioner writhayt Doe process oF a cil Forfedture, Nearing or compensation.