No. 22-5937

Prince Jones v. District of Columbia, et al.

Lower Court: District of Columbia
Docketed: 2022-10-28
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: article-iii civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-power due-process government-accountability judicial-jurisdiction standing statutory-jurisdiction
Key Terms:
Securities Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2023-01-06
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Can D.C. Superior Court Judges exercise Statutory Jurisdiction under the color of Article III judicial Power, when Article III does not provide a Statutory Jurisdiction

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS) PRESENTED . 1. Can D.C. Superior Court Juclges exercise Steclvtury Jonsdicton under +he color oF Article TIE jodheial Power, when Arhcle Tt does not provide a Staturory Sorigadictim, Ai Can D.C. Superar Court Ioalges exercise Stalvtory | Jonsdicttion over eetvhoner personally when pe hone ig not a Statetery persm, 15a pegole under the Comma Law and Arhcle TL judicial Power oloes not pronde fel Statutery jonsdichon, 3. Can DiC. Supernor Court Judges and the government Conceal yas Avhela AIL Jonsdictan, its Article TOL Standing and the -true nature ond cause of ach agamst “petrtener anal rts yodgments be lawful and binding, 4. Can Congress ole posit Artele | begisloct ‘Power into a now Constitutioal enhty, ex Comes }) am ol Such cleposit not be mM wolahon of Arhcle | sectim 8 Clovse 11 excluswe tegislatim clause over the DistnetS. Can pethmer Apply ms indindval Tenth Amendment Right “fo tne Defacko Stote government oF the BCs Corporation Camel ond Mayor, who enact D\C, CODE wwoythat q Congress om Senate. 6. \5 petroner entiited ~bo recover damages From D.C. governmuat ater \& has leecen hetermmned loy DiC. Court of Appeals, that the government violated petrtoners “Fourth Amendment Right. 7, 15 pethoer enhtted to recover Compensahar and clamages From Di government who setzed without warrant petitioners private property and hen forferted it from petrtioner writhayt Doe process oF a cil Forfedture, Nearing or compensation.

Docket Entries

2023-01-09
Petition DENIED.
2022-12-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/6/2023.
2022-11-21
Waiver of right of respondent Jodi Steiger Lazarus to respond filed.
2022-11-01
Waiver of right of respondents District of Columbia to respond filed.
2022-10-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 28, 2022)

Attorneys

District of Columbia
Caroline Sage Van ZileAttorney General for the District of Columbia, Respondent
Caroline Sage Van ZileAttorney General for the District of Columbia, Respondent
Jodi Steiger Lazarus
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Prince Jones
Prince Jones — Petitioner
Prince Jones — Petitioner