No. 22-5938
Carrington K. Joseph v. Mark Garman, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Rockview, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: certificate-of-appealability constitutional-right constitutional-rights court-of-appeals due-process habeas-corpus judicial-standard procedural-review standard-of-review substantial-showing supreme-court-precedent
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2022-12-09
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Court of Appeals decision to deny Petitioner a Certificate of Appealability conflicts with the standard articulated by this Court and its own where a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right was made?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Whether the Court of Appeals decision to deny Petitioner a Certificate of Appealability conflicts with the standard articulated by this Court and its own where a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right was made? : -i: . : a
Docket Entries
2022-12-12
Petition DENIED.
2022-11-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/9/2022.
2022-11-21
Waiver of right of respondents Mark Garman, et al. to respond filed.
2022-10-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 28, 2022)
Attorneys
Mark Garman, et al.